ArticleMolecular oncology2023
mitoSomatic: a tool for accurate identification of mitochondrial DNA somatic mutations without paired controls.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells: Implications for Tumor Dynamics and Therapeutic Strategies.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Mutational profiling of mitochondrial DNA reveals an epithelial ovarian cancer-specific evolutionary pattern contributing to high oxidative metabolism.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Article
- Circulating cell-free mtDNA as a new biomarker for cancer detection and management.Cancer biology & medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) somatic mutations play important roles in the initiation and progression of cancer. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) of paired tumor and control samples has become a common practice to identify tumor-specific mtDNA mutations, the unique nature of mtDNA and NGS-associated sequencing bias could cause false-positive/-negative somatic mutation calling. Additionally, there are clinical scenarios where matched control tissues are unavailable for comparison. Therefore, a novel approach for accurately identifying somatic mtDNA variants is greatly needed, particularly in the absence of matched controls. In this study, the ground truth mtDNA variants orthogonally validated by triple-paired tumor, adjacent nontumor, and blood samples were used to develop mitoSomatic, a random forest-based machine learning tool. We demonstrated that mitoSomatic achieved area under the curve (AUC) values over 0.99 for identifying somatic mtDNA variants without paired control in three tumor types. In addition, mitoSomatic was also applicable in nontumor tissues such as adjacent nontumor and blood samples, suggesting the flexibility of mitoSomatic's classification capability. Furthermore, analysis of triple-paired samples identified a small group of variants with uncertain somatic/germline origin, whereas application of mitoSomatic significantly facilitated the prediction of their possible source. Finally, a control-free evaluation of the public pan-cancer NGS dataset with mitoSomatic revealed a substantial number of variants that were probably misclassified by conventional tumor-control comparison, further emphasizing the usefulness of mitoSomatic in application. Taken together, our study demonstrates that mitoSomatic is valuable for accurately identifying somatic mtDNA variants in mtDNA NGS data without paired controls, applicable for both tumor and nontumor tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.