Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330695›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Rituximab pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation based on a study in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Influence of tumor size on pharmacokinetic and assessment of pharmacokinetic similarity.

Robin J Svensson, Qing Xi Ooi, Lena E Friberg, Narendra Maharaj, Pramod Kumar Reddy, Luis López-Lázaro, Emma Hansson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A tutorial on pharmacometric Markov models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Robin J SvenssonPharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Qing Xi OoiPharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4310-9842
Lena E FribergPharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-679X
Narendra MaharajDr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pramod Kumar ReddyDr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Luis López-LázaroDr. Reddy's Laboratories SA, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0620-6133
Emma HanssonPharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India) · INDr. Reddy's Laboratories (Switzerland) · CHUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories rituximab (DRL_RI; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories SA, Basel, Switzerland) is under development as a rituximab biosimilar. Study RI-01-002 (Clinical Trials Registry - India/2012/11/003129), comparing DRL_RI to the reference medicinal product (RMP) MabThera® (Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany), demonstrated pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and showed comparable pharmacodynamic, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles. We used data from the same study to perform population PK and PK-pharmacodynamic analyses: first exploring possible factors influencing the PK similarity assessment between products and then performing simulations to investigate the impact of tumor size on rituximab PK. Nonlinear mixed-effects models for PK, tumor size, tumor size-PK, and tumor response were developed independently. The final PK model included drug product as a dose-scaling parameter and predicted a 6.75% higher dose reaching the system in RMP-treated patients. However, when tumor size was included in the tumor size-PK model, the drug product effect was no longer observed. The model rather indicated that patients with larger tumor size have higher clearance. Further simulations confirmed that higher baseline tumor size is associated to slightly lower rituximab exposure. Tumor response, described by a continuous-time Markov model, did not differ between drug products. Both had higher effects during the first 20 weeks of treatment. Also, the model described a subpopulation of nonresponders to treatment (42%) with faster transitions to a worse state. The different rituximab exposure initially detected between drug products (6.75%) was shown using PK/PK-pharmacodynamic analysis to be attributed to a tumor size imbalance between treatment groups. PK/PK-pharmacodynamic analyses may contribute to PK similarity assessments.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseHumansRituximabSwitzerlandBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID36330695
PMCPMC9931428
OpenAlexW4308182206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.