ArticleInternational wound journal2023
A comparative study of full-thickness skin grafting with and without subcutaneous fat preservation.
Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functionality and Scar Evaluation of the Donor Site in Extended Radial Forearm Flap Phalloplasty: How Affected Is the Arm in Day-to-Day Life?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Is full-thickness skin grafting with subcutaneous fat preservation a better solution?International wound journal · 2024Article
- A comparative study of full-thickness skin grafting with and without subcutaneous fat preservation.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin grafting is an important method of wound repair and reconstruction. Skin grafting can be classified using multiple classification criteria. We often perform full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) for small wound areas; however, the traditional FTSG technique frequently causes postoperative scar depression at the donor site, especially in the abdomen. This study aimed to determine whether preserving the subcutaneous fat when performing FTSG can improve donor site prognosis. We reviewed 25 patients who underwent autologous FTSG in the last 3 years. Among them, subcutaneous fat was preserved in 11 patients (experimental group), whereas it was not preserved in 14 patients (control group). Using a 3D camera and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), we evaluated the donor site postoperatively. According to POSAS, vascularization was significantly more severe in the experimental group. The Antera 3D camera revealed more severe scar depression at the donor site in the control group. The processing time for graft take, subcutaneous fat trimming and donor site closure was less in the experimental group than in the control group. Preserving subcutaneous fat at the donor site improved patient outcomes by reducing donor site depression after FTSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.