Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330536›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2021

Development of a national stroke audit in Ireland: scoping review protocol.

Carlos Bruen, Niamh A Merriman, Paul J Murphy, Joan McCormack, Eithne Sexton, Joseph Harbison, David Williams, Peter J Kelly, Frances Horgan, Rónán Collins and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Frailty on Healthcare Outcomes after Cardioembolic Ischaemic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Audit as a Tool for Improving the Quality of Stroke Care: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Carlos BruenDept of Health Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-0973
Niamh A MerrimanDept of Health Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-7762
Paul J MurphyLibrary Services, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5056-1971
Joan McCormackNational Office of Clinical Audit, Dublin, Ireland.
Eithne SextonDept of Health Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-7771
Joseph HarbisonNational Office of Clinical Audit, Dublin, Ireland.
David WilliamsDept of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-462X
Peter J KellyDept of Neurology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Frances HorganSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-9953
Rónán CollinsDept of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Máirín Ní BhreacáinPatient Representative, Dublin, Ireland.
Elaine ByrneInstitute of Leadership, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7322-277X
John ThorntonDept. of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Collette TullyNational Office of Clinical Audit, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne HickeyDept of Health Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-3195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Recent advances in stroke management and care have resulted in improved survival and outcomes. However, providing equitable access to acute care, rehabilitation and longer-term stroke care is challenging. Recent Irish evidence indicates variation in stroke outcomes across hospitals, and a need for continuous audit of stroke care to support quality improvement. The aim of this project is to develop a core minimum dataset for use in the new Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS), which aims to improve the standard of stroke care in Ireland. This paper outlines the protocol for conducting a scoping review of international practice and guidelines in auditing acute and non-acute stroke care. Objective Identify data items that are currently collected by stroke audits internationally, and identify audit guidelines that exist for recommending inclusion of content in stroke audit datasets. Methods and analysis This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Grey literature will also be searched for relevant materials, as will relevant websites. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two researchers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data charting and synthesis will involve sub-dividing relevant sources of evidence, and synthesising data into three categories: i) acute stroke care; ii) non-acute stroke care; and iii) audit data collection procedures and resourcing. Data will be charted using a standardised form specific to each category. Consultation with knowledge users will be conducted at all stages of the scoping review. Discussion This scoping review will contribute to a larger project aimed at developing an internationally benchmarked stroke audit tool that will be used prospectively to collect data on all stroke admissions in Ireland, encompassing both acute and non-acute data items.

Indexed as

auditoutcome assessmentquality improvementquality of careregistriesStroke

Identifiers

PMID36330536
PMCPMC9607932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.