ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following up-front cytoreductive surgery versus cytoreductive surgery alone for isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases: A retrospective, observational study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Functional biomaterials for the diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.Smart medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To date, the value of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following up-front resection for isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases seems controversial. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2012, to September 1, 2019, at a tertiary medical center in China. Patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases were included in CRS plus HIPEC group or CRS alone group based on the treatment history. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 78 patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases were identified among 396 patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. 43 were in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 35 were in the cytoreductive surgery alone group. Among them, 61 patients had relapse-free survival data. The median peritoneal cancer index was 4 in all patients. After a median follow-up of 46.0 months, 5-year overall survival was 66.8% and the median relapse-free survival was 36.0 (95% CI, 6.8-65.1) months in the CRS plus HIPEC group. 5-year overall survival was 31.2% and the median relapse-free survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.0-15.0) months in the CRS alone group. Cox regression analyses showed that HIPEC was the independent prognostic factor for overall survival ( Conclusion: Findings of the present study suggest that HIPEC following up-front CRS could improve overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.