ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Systematic analysis of the effects of genetic variants on chromatin accessibility to decipher functional variants in non-coding regions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cis-regulatory and long noncoding RNA alterations in breast cancer - current insights, biomarker utility, and the critical need for functional validation.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
- Natural selection exerted by historical coronavirus epidemic(s): comparative genetic analysis in China Kadoorie Biobank and UK Biobank.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genotype inference from aggregated chromatin accessibility data reveals genetic regulatory mechanisms.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Genotype inference from aggregated chromatin accessibility data reveals genetic regulatory mechanisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Towards functional maps of non-coding variants in cancer.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Pancan-MNVQTLdb: systematic identification of multi-nucleotide variant quantitative trait loci in 33 cancer types.NAR cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) has identified thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with complex diseases and traits. However, deciphering the functions of these SNPs still faces challenges. Recent studies have shown that SNPs could alter chromatin accessibility and result in differences in tumor susceptibility between individuals. Therefore, systematically analyzing the effects of SNPs on chromatin accessibility could help decipher the functions of SNPs, especially those in non-coding regions. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), chromatin accessibility quantitative trait locus (caQTL) analysis was conducted to estimate the associations between genetic variants and chromatin accessibility. We analyzed caQTLs in 23 human cancer types and identified 9,478 caQTLs in breast carcinoma (BRCA). In BRCA, these caQTLs tend to alter the binding affinity of transcription factors, and open chromatin regions regulated by these caQTLs are enriched in regulatory elements. By integrating with eQTL data, we identified 141 caQTLs showing a strong signal for colocalization with eQTLs. We also identified 173 caQTLs in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) loci and inferred several possible target genes of these caQTLs. By performing survival analysis, we found that ~10% caQTLs potentially influence the prognosis of patients. To facilitate access to relevant data, we developed a user-friendly data portal, BCaQTL (http://gong_lab.hzau.edu.cn/caqtl_database), for data searching and downloading. Our work may facilitate fine-map regulatory mechanisms underlying risk loci of cancer and discover the biomarkers or therapeutic targets for cancer prognosis. The BCaQTL database will be an important resource for genetic and epigenetic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.