ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Differential subsampling with cartesian ordering: A high spatial-temporal resolution dixon imaging sequence for assessment of dural arteriovenous fistula.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of differential subsampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) in comparison to time of flight (TOF) in detecting dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVF), cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and hemodynamics. Methods: Sixty-two cases (24 female; aged 14-75; mean age, 51.3 years) were included in our study, with 42 positive and 20 negative cases Results: Diagnostic sensitivities of DISCO and TOF for DAVF were 92.86 and 64.29%; specificities were 95.0% and 95.0%; while accuracies were 93.55 and 74.19% respectively. For detected CVT, sensitivities of DISCO and TOF were 100 and 92.31%; specificities were 96.55 and 93.10%; with accuracies 97.62 and 92.86% respectively. In hemodynamic analysis, sensitivity of DISCO for reflux was 95.45%; with a specificity of 95.0%; and accuracy 95.24%. The inter-observer kappa values were 0.857 for DISCO ( Conclusion: DISCO showed a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, suggesting its effectiveness in detecting DAVF with or without CVT. Intracranial hemodynamics can be identified using DISCO in DAVF patients, providing accurate evaluation of cerebral blood flow dynamics during the pre-treatment phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.