ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Pre-operative external ventricle drainage improves neurological outcomes for patients with traumatic intracerebellar hematomas.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Traumatic intracerebellar hematoma (TICH) is a very rare entity with a high morbidity and mortality rate, and there is no consensus on its optimal surgical management. In particular, whether and when to place external ventricle drainage in TICH patients without acute hydrocephalus pre-operation is still controversial. Methods: A single-institutional, retrospective analysis of total of 47 TICH patients with craniectomy hematoma evacuation in a tertiary medical center from January 2009 to October 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were mortality in hospital and neurological function evaluated by GOS at discharge and 6 months after the ictus. Special attention was paid to the significance of external ventricular drainage (EVD) in TICH patients without acute hydrocephalus on admission. Results: Analysis of the clinical characteristics of the TICH patients revealed that the odds of use of EVD were seen in patients with IVH, fourth ventricle compression, and acute hydrocephalus. Placement of EVD at the bedside can significantly improve the GCS score before craniotomy, as well as the neurological score at discharge and 6 months. Compared with the only hematoma evacuation (HE) group, there is a trend that EVD can reduce hospital mortality and decrease the occurrence of delayed hydrocephalus, although the difference is not statistically significant. In addition, EVD can reduce the average NICU stay time, but has no effect on the total length of stay. Moreover, our data showed that EVD did not increase the risk of associated bleeding and intracranial infection. Interestingly, in terms of neurological function at discharge and 6 month after the ictus, even though without acute hydrocephalus on admission, the TICH patients can still benefit from EVD insertion. Conclusion: For TICH patients, perioperative EVD is safe and can significantly improve neurological prognosis. Especially for patients whose GCS dropped by more than 2 points before the operation, EVD can significantly improve the patient's GCS score, reduce the risk of herniation, and gain more time for surgical preparation. Even for TICH patients without acute hydrocephalus on admission CT scan, EVD placement still has positive clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.