Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330417›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Development and validation of the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound in the classification of splenic trauma.

Xue Jiang, Yukun Luo, Xuelei He, Kun Wang, Wenjing Song, Qinggui Ye, Lei Feng, Wei Wang, Xiaojuan Hu, Hua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xue JiangDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yukun LuoDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuelei HeSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Kun WangCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenjing SongDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qinggui YeDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei FengDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan HuDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua LiBeijing Mindray Medical Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spleen is the most vulnerable organ in abdominal trauma. Ultrasound (US) has become an important examination method for splenic trauma. However, the sensitivity of routine US in the diagnosis of splenic trauma is low. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve the sensitivity, but it also has some limitations. This study sought to explore the application value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted US in the classification of splenic trauma. Methods: The splenic injuries of Bama miniature pigs were established. A large number of ultrasonic images were collected. Then, 3-fold cross validation (CV) was used to establish the animal models. Next, clinical ultrasonic images were collected at multiple centers. All injuries were diagnosed by CEUS, enhanced CT or surgery. We used animal models to fine tune a small amount of human data, and then established the final AI splenic trauma recognition model. The whole model was constructed by averaging the prediction ability of the 3 fine-tuned models. Finally, 2 doctors' recognition US results of splenic trauma were compared to the AI recognition results. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance in diagnosis of spleen trauma. Results: (I) Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the test cohort 1 (AUC =0.90) and 2 (AUC =0.84) had a similar performance. Based on the decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, while threshold smaller than 0.8, the proposed model had better performance on test cohort 1 than test cohort 2. Test cohort 1 had higher sensitivity (0.82 Conclusions: AI-assisted US diagnosis of splenic trauma can significantly improve the ultrasonic diagnosis rate. We still need to increase the number of samples to further improve the diagnostic efficiency of the model.

Indexed as

deep learningsplenic injuryTraumaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36330417
PMCPMC9622480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.