ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Entity relation extraction in the medical domain: based on data augmentation.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of reinforcement learning for natural language processing and applications in healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Review
- An improved data augmentation approach and its application in medical named entity recognition.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Entity relation extraction is an important task in the construction of professional knowledge graphs in the medical field. Research on entity relation extraction for academic books in the medical field has revealed that there is a great difference in the number of different entity relations, which has led to the formation of a typical unbalanced data set that is difficult to recognize but has certain research value. Methods: In this article, we propose a new entity relation extraction method based on data augmentation. According to the distribution of individual entity relation classes in the data set, the probability of whether a text is augmented during training was calculated. In text-oriented data augmentation, different augmentation methods perform differently in different language environments. The reinforcement of learning determines which data augmentation method to use in the current language environment. This strategy was applied to the entity relation extraction of the medical professional book, Results: The deep-learning model using data augmentation was better than the model without data augmentation, as data augmentation significantly improved the evaluation indicators of the relation classes with low data volumes in the unbalanced data set and slightly improved the evaluation indicators of the relation classes with sufficient features and large data volumes. Additionally, the deep-learning model using reinforcement learning-based data augmentation was superior to the deep-learning model using traditional data augmentation. We found that after the application of reinforcement learning-based data augmentation, the evaluation indicators of the multiple relation classes were much better than those to which reinforcement learning-based data augmentation had not been applied. Conclusions: For unbalanced data sets, data augmentation can effectively improve the ability of the deep-learning model to obtain data features, and reinforcement learning-based data augmentation can further enhance this ability. Our experiments confirmed the superiority of reinforcement learning-based data augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.