ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Identification and validation of a 9-gene signature for the prognosis of ovarian cancer by integrated bioinformatical analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Phosphatase activity-based PPM1K: a key player in the regulation of mitochondrial function and its multifaceted impact in diseases.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Glutamine metabolism prognostic index predicts tumour microenvironment characteristics and therapeutic efficacy in ovarian cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal malignancy among gynecological cancers worldwide. It is urgent to identify effective biomarkers for the prognosis and diagnosis of OC. Methods: We analyzed 4 OC Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data sets to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). To explore potential correlations between the gene sets and clinical features, we conducted weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Hub genes were identified from the key modules by univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses and risk scores were calculated based on the expressions of the hub genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the values of the diagnoses for OC patients. We also determined the predictive value of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) score in response to immunotherapy and chemotherapeutic drugs. Results: DEGs were analyzed between the OC and normal ovarian tissues and prognostic modules were identified by a WGCNA. Nine hub genes chose from the prognostic modules were determined the prognostic values in OC. The risk scores were calculated based on the expression of hub genes, and patients with high-risk scores had poor survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor for OC. Additionally, the levels of hub genes were also found to be related to immune cell infiltration in OC microenvironments. An immunotherapy cohort showed that high-risk scores enhanced the response to anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy and was remarkably correlated with the inflamed immune phenotype, and had significant therapeutic advantages and clinical benefits. Further, patients with high-risk scores were more sensitive to midostaurin. Conclusions: We identified the risk score including protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1K (PPM1K), protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit alpha (PPP1CA), exostosin glycosyltransferase 1 (EXT1), RAB GTPase activating protein 1 like (RABGAP1L), mitotic arrest deficient 2 like 1 (MAD2L1), xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC), Egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 3 (EGLN3), cyclin D1 binding protein 1 (CCNDBP1), and zinc finger protein 25 (ZNF25), and validated their prognostic and predicted values for OC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.