Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330367›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Evaluating the impact of pop-off mechanisms in boys with posterior urethral valves.

T Delefortrie, C Ferdynus, A Paye-Jaouen, J L Michel, E Dobremez, M Peycelon, A El Ghoneimi, L Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [2024 EAU/ESPU paediatric urology guidelines: key updates on congenital lower urinary tract obstruction and clinical inter-pretation].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pop-off mechanisms in fetal megacystis: extravasation, umbilical cord cyst, ureterocele and megaureter.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T DelefortrieDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
C FerdynusUnité de Soutien Méthodologique, CHU F Guyon, Saint-Denis de La Réunion, France.
A Paye-JaouenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
J L MichelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, CHU F Guyon, Saint-Denis de La Réunion, France.
E DobremezDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, CHU Pellegrin-Enfants, Bordeaux, France.
M PeycelonDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
A El GhoneimiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
L HarperDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, CHU F Guyon, Saint-Denis de La Réunion, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Posterior urethral valves are urethral leaflets that cause Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO) in boys and are associated with congenital renal dysplasia and abnormal bladder function. They affect 1:4,000 to 1:25,000 births and can be responsible for End-Stage Renal Failure in childhood. There have been several studies on the effect of pop-off mechanisms in boys with posterior urethral valves, but results are contradictory. We aimed to assess and discuss the effect of pop-off mechanisms on renal function in a large cohort of patients. Patients and method: Boys with PUV with and without pop-off mechanisms (urinoma, VURD or giant bladder diverticula) were divided into three severity groups for renal function according to their nadir creatinine (low-risk NC < 35 μmol/L, intermediate-risk NC between 35 and 75 μmol/L, and high-risk NC > 75 μmol/L). We compared children with and children without pop-off mechanisms for mean renal function as well as patient distribution within each severity group. Results: We included 137 boys of which 39 had a pop-off mechanism. Patients had complete data for at least 5 years follow-up. Though there was no significant statistical difference in mean renal function between the pop-off and non-pop-off group, patient distribution within each severity group varied according to whether patients had a pop-off mechanism or not. Conclusion: Though there was no significant difference in mean renal function between boys with and without pop-off mechanisms, it is possible that these are two different patient populations and direct comparison is not possible.

Indexed as

bladder diverticulapop-off mechanismposterior urethral valvesrenal functionurinomaVURD

Identifiers

PMID36330367
PMCPMC9622767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.