Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330324›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2022

Experimental challenges in determining the rheological properties of bacterial biofilms.

Steffen Geisel, Eleonora Secchi, Jan Vermant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanical Comparison ofACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microstructural and Rheological Transitions in Bacterial Biofilms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steffen GeiselLaboratory for Soft Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-3103
Eleonora SecchiDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0949-9085
Jan VermantLaboratory for Soft Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-0656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are communities living in a matrix consisting of self-produced, hydrated extracellular polymeric substances. Most microorganisms adopt the biofilm lifestyle since it protects by conferring resistance to antibiotics and physico-chemical stress factors. Consequently, mechanical removal is often necessary but rendered difficult by the biofilm's complex, viscoelastic response, and adhesive properties. Overall, the mechanical behaviour of biofilms also plays a role in the spreading, dispersal and subsequent colonization of new surfaces. Therefore, the characterization of the mechanical properties of biofilms plays a crucial role in controlling and combating biofilms in industrial and medical environments. We performed

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisbiofilmbiofilm mechanicsrheology

Identifiers

PMID36330324
PMCPMC9560794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.