ReviewAcute medicine & surgery
Preliminary study of prehospital use of smart glasses.
Review in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smart Glasses in Reducing Patient Care Time in Emergency Departments: Cohort Study From the Hangzhou Asian Games.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Novel Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Digital Network for Prehospital Emergency Support: Community Intervention Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Telemedicine via data glasses in CBRN protection suit-Evaluation of medical qualification and technical feasibility.PloS one · 2025Article
- Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of Smart Glasses on Patient Care Time in Emergency Medical Services Ambulance.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A smart glasses system is a computerized communicator with a transparent screen and video camera that can be worn as a pair of glasses. There have been no reports on the use of smart glasses in the prehospital setting. Purpose: To conduct a preliminary investigation on whether smart glasses were smoothly used bidirectionally between the prehospital setting and the receiving hospital. Methods: From March 1, 2022, to March 31, 2022, one smart glasses unit was installed in an ambulance at one branch of the fire department near our hospital. The physician on the computer, who received video and voice transmission from the smart glasses when the ambulance was dispatched, evaluated the transmission status with regard to video reception, voice reception, and voice transmission. In addition, the activity time was compared between cases in which the smart glasses system was used (patient) and not used (control). Results: During the investigating period, 12 cases were analyzed as patients. The rate of good video reception was 75%, the rate of good voice reception was 50%, and the rate of good voice transmission was 25%. There was no significant change in the activity time between the patient and control groups. Conclusion: We performed a preliminary investigation on the usability of smart glasses in the prehospital setting. Using smart glasses, patient information was shared by video and voice before arrival at the hospital, and did not affect the activity time. However, the instability of the communication status should be recognized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.