Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330298›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2022

Fruit fly phylogeny imprints bacterial gut microbiota.

Virginie Ravigné, Nathalie Becker, François Massol, Erwan Guichoux, Christophe Boury, Frédéric Mahé, Benoit Facon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginie RavignéCIRAD UMR PHIM Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-2574
Nathalie BeckerUMR ISYEB MNHN Paris France.
François MassolInserm CHU Lille Institut Pasteur de Lille U1019 - UMR 9017 Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille (CIIL) CNRS Université de Lille Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X
Erwan GuichouxINRAE - UMR 1202 BIOGECO - Plateforme Genome Transcriptome de Bordeaux Cestas France.
Christophe BouryINRAE - UMR 1202 BIOGECO - Plateforme Genome Transcriptome de Bordeaux Cestas France.
Frédéric MahéCIRAD UMR PHIM Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2808-0984
Benoit FaconUMR CBGP INRAE Montferrier-sur-Lez France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One promising avenue for reconciling the goals of crop production and ecosystem preservation consists in the manipulation of beneficial biotic interactions, such as between insects and microbes. Insect gut microbiota can affect host fitness by contributing to development, host immunity, nutrition, or behavior. However, the determinants of gut microbiota composition and structure, including host phylogeny and host ecology, remain poorly known. Here, we used a well-studied community of eight sympatric fruit fly species to test the contributions of fly phylogeny, fly specialization, and fly sampling environment on the composition and structure of bacterial gut microbiota. Comprising both specialists and generalists, these species belong to five genera from to two tribes of the Tephritidae family. For each fly species, one field and one laboratory samples were studied. Bacterial inventories to the genus level were produced using 16S metabarcoding with the Oxford Nanopore Technology. Sample bacterial compositions were analyzed with recent network-based clustering techniques. Whereas gut microbiota were dominated by the Enterobacteriaceae family in all samples, microbial profiles varied across samples, mainly in relation to fly identity and sampling environment. Alpha diversity varied across samples and was higher in the Dacinae tribe than in the Ceratitinae tribe. Network analyses allowed grouping samples according to their microbial profiles. The resulting groups were very congruent with fly phylogeny, with a significant modulation of sampling environment, and with a very low impact of fly specialization. Such a strong imprint of host phylogeny in sympatric fly species, some of which share much of their host plants, suggests important control of fruit flies on their gut microbiota through vertical transmission and/or intense filtering of environmental bacteria.

Indexed as

community ecologylong‐read sequencingmetabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID36330298
PMCPMC9624087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.