ArticleAIMS public health2022
Perceived neighborhood social cohesion and cervical and breast cancer screening utilization among U.S.-born and immigrant women.
Article in AIMS public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlates of Mammogram Screening Among Brazilian Immigrant Women in the United States: Analysis of 2020 Cross-Sectional Survey Data.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Evaluating the association between upstream perceived individual and neighborhood determinants of health and intensity of breast cancer screening.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Neighborhood Factors Related to Cancer Screening in Texas: A Spatioecological Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Indices of neighborhood disadvantage and individual cancer control behaviors among African American adults.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.Current epidemiology reports · 2025Review
- Exploring Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: An Ecological Analysis of Australian Data.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Determinants of Protective Healthcare Services Awareness among Female Syrian Refugees in Turkey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research suggests that factors beyond the individual level, such as neighborhood-level factors, warrant further investigation in explaining preventive screening utilization disparities. In addition, research shows that immigrant women, especially recent immigrants, are less likely than U.S.-born women to utilize preventive screenings. Our study examined the relationship between perceived neighborhood social cohesion and breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among U.S.-born and immigrant women. Data came from the 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The sample for this study included 7801 women ages 21-64 without a hysterectomy. Of them, 1477 (19%) reported being born outside the United States. Logistic regression was used to examine associations of perceived neighborhood social cohesion and sociodemographic factors with the odds of screening by nativity status. Though we found no link between neighborhood social cohesion and Papanicolaou (Pap) test or mammogram utilization, our findings contribute to understanding sociodemographic barriers to and facilitators of preventive screening utilization among immigrant and U.S.-born women. Most importantly, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in Pap tests and mammogram utilization were evident among immigrant women. The disparities we identified indicate the need to target prevention messages and tailor interventions to address each group's sociodemographic characteristics and needs. Our findings also support the need to expand health insurance so that all women are covered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.