Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330286›Full record

ArticleAIMS public health2022

Examining disparities in the early adoption of Covid-19 personal mitigation across family structures.

Casey T Harris, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Michael Niño, Priya Thelapurath, Grant Drawve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIMS public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Casey T HarrisUniversity of Arkansas, Department of Sociology and Criminology, 211 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Kevin FitzpatrickUniversity of Arkansas, Department of Sociology and Criminology, 211 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Michael NiñoUniversity of Arkansas, Department of Sociology and Criminology, 211 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Priya ThelapurathHarvard University, Studies of Women, Gender, and Sexuality.
Grant DrawveUniversity of Arkansas, Department of Sociology and Criminology, 211 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR 72701.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States' response to the COVID-19 pandemic has relied heavily on personal mitigation behaviors versus centralized governmental prevention strategies, especially early in the virus's outbreak. This study examines how family structure shapes mitigation, focusing on the intersectional effects of gender, marital status, and the presence of children while accounting for differences in worry about infection from the virus. Using data from a national survey of 10,368 United States adults early in the pandemic (March 2020), survey-weighted logistic regression models show important differences in the likelihood of personal mitigation adoption across family structures. Unmarried women with children were most likely to report personal mitigation behaviors, including washing hands more frequently and avoiding social gatherings. Our findings highlight the differential impacts of the pandemic on those living in specific family circumstances.

Indexed as

coronavirusfamilygendermitigationrisk

Identifiers

PMID36330286
PMCPMC9581744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.