ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Identification of the genes at
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Breeding Technique for F1 Hybrid Production From Self-Incompatible Species.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Several plant self-incompatibility systems may be controlled by atypical receptor-ligand interactions.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Pan-genome analysis of wax apple (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification and expression patterns analysis of the DREB gene family under various abiotic stress in Lolium perenne.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- S-RNase-based self-incompatibility in angiosperms: Degradation, condensation, and evolution.Plant physiology · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms and genetic regulation of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: implications for crop improvement and evolutionary biology.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Abiotic stress responses in forage crops and grasses: the role of secondary metabolites and biotechnological interventions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Rapid detection of RNase-based self-incompatibility in Lysimachia monelli (Primulaceae).American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-incompatibility (SI) is a feature of many flowering plants, whereby self-pollen is recognized and rejected by the stigma. In grasses (Poaceae), the genes controlling this phenomenon have not been fully elucidated. Grasses have a unique two-locus system, in which two independent genetic loci (S and Z) control self-recognition. S and Z are thought to have arisen from an ancient duplication, common to all grasses. With new chromosome-scale genome data, we examined the genes present at S- and Z-loci, firstly in ryegrass (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.