ArticleJournal of patient experience2022
Telephone Clinics During the Covid-19 Pandemic-The Experiences of Interstitial Lung Disease Patients and Their Carers.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Caring for Rural Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: Perspectives of Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Care Center Network Nurses and Providers.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Self-management interventions for people with pulmonary fibrosis: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Article
- Holistic management of patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread move towards virtual consultations within secondary care due to infection concerns. This service evaluation undertaken in a Welsh Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) specialist center looks at the experiences of unselected ILD patients and their careers with telephone consultations and aims to identify the role of telephone consultations in future practice for this patient group. A mixed methods approach was used with an initial postal questionnaire followed by a virtual focus group. From the 84 patient and 26 carer questionnaire responses, there was broad support for telephone consultations from both groups. The main perceived benefit was reduced infection risk, although face-to-face consultations were seen as holding more value. Themes identified in the virtual focus group of 6 participants recognized the need to balance quality of care against practical considerations. In conclusion, there was support for future telephone consultations if patients and clinicians have flexibility in determining when this occurs, instead of a face-to-face consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.