ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
The predictive potential of contrast-enhanced computed tomography based radiomics in the preoperative staging of cT4 gastric cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale Spatial Fusion Feature-Driven Characterization of Gastric Cancer Invasive Margins: A Multicenter Cohort Study for Preoperative Accurate Differentiation Between T4a and T4b Subtypes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Evolving Paradigms in Gastric Cancer Staging: From Conventional Imaging to Advanced MRI and Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a deep learning model for T1N0 gastric cancer diagnosis using 2.5D radiomic data in preoperative CT images.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics for gastric cancer serosal invasion: automated segmentation and multi-machine learning from two centers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Novel computed tomography-based nomograms for the pretherapeutic prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin with or without the addition of docetaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Global trends in indocyanine green fluorescence navigation in the field of gastric cancer: bibliometrics and knowledge atlas analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of preoperative staging is crucial for cT4 stage gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to develop the radiomics model and evaluate its predictive potential for differentiating preoperative cT4 stage gastric cancer patients into pT4b and no-pT4b patients. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 704 gastric cancer patients with preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) staging cT4 between January 2008 and December 2021. These patients were divided into the training cohort (478 patients, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University) and validation cohort (226 patients, the Weihai Wendeng District People's Hospital). According to the pathological stage of the tumors, the patients were divided into pT4b or no-pT4b stage. In the training cohort, the clinical and radiomics features were analyzed to construct the clinical model, tri-phase radiomics signatures and nomogram. Two kinds of methods were employed to achieve dimensionality reduction: (I) the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO); and (II) the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithms. We utilized Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Decision tree and Adaptive boosted tree (AdaBoost) algorithms as the machine learning classifiers. The nomogram was constructed on the clinical characteristics and the Rad-score. The performance of the models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) curve and calibration curve. Results: The 345 pT4b and 359 no-pT4b stage patients were included in this study. In the validation cohort, the AUC of the clinical model was 0.793 (95% CI: 0.732-0.855). The tri-phase radiomics features combined with the SVM algorithm was the best radiomics signature with an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.812-0.912). The nomogram was the best predictive model of all with an AUC of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.834-0.927). In the training and validation cohorts, the calibration curves and DCA curves of the nomogram showed satisfactory result. Conclusions: CE-CT-based radiomics nomogram offers good accuracy and stability in differentiating preoperative cT4 stage gastric cancer patients into pT4b and non-pT4b stages, which has a great clinical relevance for selecting the course of treatment for cT4 stage gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.