ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics-based artificial intelligence models in brain tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- A dual-discriminator conditional generative adversarial network (DDcGAN) approach to glioma grade classification with structural MRI images fusion.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Multimodal Machine-Learning Model for Non-Invasive Preoperative Glioma Grading.Cancers · 2026Article
- Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models for preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Predictive value of mono-exponential and multiple mathematical models in locally advanced rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Predicting IDH and 1p/19q molecular status of gliomas with multi-b values DWI.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Quality Assessment of MRI-Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Methods in Classification of Brain Tumors: Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models at high b values for assessing cervical cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Histogram analysis of quantitative susceptibility mapping and apparent diffusion coefficient for identifying isocitrate dehydrogenase genotypes and tumor subtypes of adult-type diffuse gliomas.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Brain Tumors and Their Habitat: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype, histological phenotype, and Ki-67 expression level in diffuse gliomas with an advanced contrast analysis of magnetic resonance imaging sequences.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Enhancing clinical decision-making: An externally validated machine learning model for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas using radiomics from presurgical magnetic resonance imaging.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate grading of gliomas is a challenge in imaging diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach based on multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating low- and high-grade adult gliomas. Methods: A model was developed from an initial cohort containing 74 patients with pathology-confirmed gliomas, who underwent 3 tesla (3T) diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 21 b values. In all, 112 histogram features were extracted from 16 parameters derived from seven diffusion models [monoexponential, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), fractional order calculus (FROC), continuous-time random walk (CTRW), stretched-exponential, and statistical]. Feature selection and model training were performed using five randomly permuted five-fold cross-validations. An internal test set (15 cases of the primary dataset) and an external cohort (n=55) imaged on a different scanner were used to validate the model. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with that of a single DWI model and DWI radiomics using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Seven significant multiparametric DWI features (two from the stretched-exponential and FROC models, and three from the CTRW model) were selected to construct the model. The multiparametric DWI model achieved the highest AUC (0.84, versus 0.71 for the single DWI model, P<0.05), an accuracy of 0.80 in the internal test, and both AUC and accuracy of 0.76 in the external test. Conclusions: Our multiparametric DWI model differentiated low- (LGG) from high-grade glioma (HGG) with better generalization performance than the established single DWI model. This result suggests that the application of an ML approach with multiple DWI models is feasible for the preoperative grading of gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.