Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330149›Full record

ArticleMedia psychology2022

Just a Joke? Adolescents' Preferences for Humor in Media Entertainment and Real-Life Aggression.

Amber van der Wal, J Loes Pouwels, Jessica Taylor Piotrowski, Patti M Valkenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Media psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amber van der WalAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0301-5502
J Loes PouwelsAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-392X
Jessica Taylor PiotrowskiAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-5197
Patti M ValkenburgAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-8429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humorous media entertainment frequently punctuates the everyday lives of adolescents. Theorists have suggested that this exposure may impact behavior, particularly real-life aggression. Specifically, exposure to prosocial (coping) humor in media entertainment is posited to decrease aggression, whereas the reverse has been argued for exposure to antisocial (disparaging and slapstick) humor. Despite these suppositions, little empirical evidence about this relationship exists. To fill this gap, this study employed a cohort-sequential design using latent growth curve models to estimate the (co-)development of adolescents' preferences for television shows featuring disparaging, slapstick, and coping humor and aggression from age 10 to 17. Results showed that at the onset of adolescence, especially boys had a higher preference for shows with disparaging and slapstick humor than with coping humor. However, over the course of adolescence, boys' and girls' preferences for shows with coping humor increased, while especially girls' preferences for shows with disparaging and slapstick humor decreased. These preferences were unrelated to adolescents' aggression. Our findings provide an important addition to the ongoing media effects debate. Taken together, they offer room for optimism and point toward an increased focus on the potential positive rather than the negative sides of humor in the lives of young people.

Identifiers

PMID36330149
PMCPMC9621101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.