Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330103›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2022

COVID-19, lifestyle behaviors and mental health: A mixed methods study of women 6 months following a hypertensive pregnancy.

Megan L Gow, Chris Rossiter, Lynne Roberts, Maddison J Henderson, Lin Yang, Judith Roche, Erin Hayes, Alison Canty, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson, Amanda Henry

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megan L GowThe University of Sydney Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Chris RossiterSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lynne RobertsWomen's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Maddison J HendersonThe University of Sydney Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Lin YangWomen's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Judith RocheRoyal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Erin HayesRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Alison CantyWomen's Health Initiative Translational Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth Denney-WilsonSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amanda HenryWomen's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unprecedented challenges to both the physical and psychological health of postpartum women. The aim of this study was to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the diet, physical activity and mental health of women 6 months following a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Methods: Mixed methods sub-study of the Blood Pressure Postpartum trial, which recruited women following a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy from six Sydney metropolitan hospitals. Cross sectional analysis of baseline quantitative data, collected at 6-months postpartum from March 2019-February 2022, and qualitative data analysis from semi-structured telephone interviews, was performed. Dates of COVID-19 lockdowns for Sydney, Australia were collected from government websites. Diet (vegetable, fruit, alcohol, take away intake) and physical activity (walking, vigorous activity, strength training frequency and duration) were assessed using the self-report NSW Population Health Survey. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Edinburgh Depression Scale and GAD-7 scale, respectively. Outcome data were compared between women who completed surveys "In Lockdown" vs. "Not in Lockdown" as well as "Prior to any Lockdown" vs. "During or Following any Lockdown". Results: Of 506 participants, 84 women completed the study surveys "In Lockdown," and 149 completed the surveys "Prior to any Lockdown." Thirty-four participants were interviewed. There were no statistically significant differences in diet, physical activity, depression and anxiety among women who completed the survey "In Lockdown" vs. "Not in Lockdown." "Prior to any Lockdown," participants were more likely to do any walking (95% vs. 89%, Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the confinements of lockdown did not markedly influence the mental health, diet and physical activity behaviors of women 6 months following hypertensive pregnancy. However, physical activity levels were reduced following the emergence of COVID-19, suggesting targeted efforts may be necessary to re-engage postpartum women with exercise. Trial registration: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376286&isReview=true, identifier: ACTRN12618002004246.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMental HealthPandemicsPregnancyanxietyCOVID-19depressiondiethypertensive pregnancyphysical activitypostpartumpreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID36330103
PMCPMC9623114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.