Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330080›Full record

ArticleNature reviews psychology2022

A network approach can improve eating disorder conceptualization and treatment.

Cheri A Levinson, Claire Cusack, Mackenzie L Brown, April R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Essential Training for an Essential Role: Dietitians and Eating Disorder Care.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Healthcare utilization for eating disorders in Australia: 10 years of health data linkage.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheri A LevinsonDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Claire CusackDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Mackenzie L BrownDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
April R SmithDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.

Funding

Innovations in Personalizing Treatment for Eating Disorders Using Idiographic Methods and the Impact of Personalization on Psychological, Physical, and Sociodemographic OutcomesDP2MH136495 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Cheri Alicia Levinson · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
A Pilot Investigation of Network-Informed Personalized Treatment for Eating Disorders versus Enhanced Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Dynamic Mechanisms of ChangeR34MH128213 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI LEVINSON, CHERI ALICIA · 2022 to 2024
$976k
NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH136495NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH128213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating disorders are severe mental illnesses with the second highest mortality rate of all psychiatric illnesses. Eating disorders are exceedingly deadly because of their complexity. Specifically, eating disorders are highly comorbid with other psychiatric illnesses (up to 95% of individuals with an eating disorder have at least one additional psychiatric illness), have extremely heterogeneous presentations, and individuals often migrate from one specific eating disorder diagnosis to another. In this Perspective, we propose that understanding eating disorder comorbidity and heterogeneity via a network theory approach offers substantial benefits for both conceptualization and treatment. Such a conceptualization, strongly based on theory, can identify specific pathways that maintain psychiatric comorbidity, how diagnoses vary across individuals, and how specific symptoms and comorbidities maintain illness for one individual, thereby paving the way for personalized treatment.

Identifiers

PMID36330080
PMCPMC9624475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.