Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36330059›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Effect of keratometric astigmatism on visual outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction.

Shengtao Liu, Lanhui Yu, Zhiyuan Lu, Chiwen Cheng, Xuejun Gu, Jingying Liu, Xingtao Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengtao LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lanhui YuAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhiyuan LuAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chiwen ChengAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xuejun GuAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jingying LiuAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xingtao ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of keratometric astigmatism on visual outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: Eighty eyes undergoing SMILE for myopia correction were classified into two groups based on preoperative keratometric astigmatism: low keratometric astigmatism (LA) and high keratometric astigmatism (HA) groups. Refractive outcomes, vector components, and changes in higher order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At the postoperative 6-month visit, no significant difference was observed in the decentered distance between the HA and LA groups (HA: 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, LA: 0.16 ± 0.08 mm, Conclusions: SMILE for high keratometric astigmatism could achieve comparable treatment centration and visual quality to that of low keratometric astigmatism.

Indexed as

high keratometric astigmatismlow keratometric astigmatismmyopiasmall incision lenticule extractionvisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36330059
PMCPMC9623282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.