Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329983›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy.

Edoardo Mercadante, Nicola Martucci, Giuseppe De Luca, Antonello La Rocca, Carmine La Manna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Uniportal robotic‑assisted thoracic surgery for anatomical lung resections: initial experience and technical feasibility.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Uniportal robotic thoracic surgery - an early Indian experience.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edoardo MercadanteThoracic Surgery Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori â€" IRCCS â€" Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Nicola MartucciThoracic Surgery Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori â€" IRCCS â€" Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe De LucaThoracic Surgery Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori â€" IRCCS â€" Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Antonello La RoccaThoracic Surgery Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori â€" IRCCS â€" Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Carmine La MannaThoracic Surgery Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori â€" IRCCS â€" Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Invasiveness is considered one of the cornerstones of every field of surgery, and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) approaches are now routinely used worldwide to perform pulmonary resections. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become the preferred technique in many centers; it is routinely performed using three or four ports with at least one service incision, contrasting with the real concept of invasiveness, especially when compared to uniportal VATS (U-VATS). Hereby, we present our early experience with uniportal RATS (U-RATS) pulmonary resections for early-stage lung cancer. Technical details of surgical steps are accurately described and commented on. Results: Twenty-four consecutive patients with lung cancer underwent U-RATS anatomical pulmonary resections at our institute. All procedures were completed with the uniportal approach. The mean operative time was 210 min (range 120-350); in the last 10 cases, the operative time was significantly reduced (180 min) compared to the first 10 cases (232 min) ( Conclusions: U-RATS is a safe and feasible technique, combining the advantages of U-VATS with the well-known advantages of robotic surgery.

Indexed as

ratsrobotic thoracic surgeryrobotic thoracic surgery (RATS)thoracoscopic surgeryuniportal RATSuniportal VATSVATS

Identifiers

PMID36329983
PMCPMC9624124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.