ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022
Clinical findings, diagnosis and therapy of patent ductus venosus in children: a case series.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between the Closure Time of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants and Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Umbilical Vein Calcification Associated with Double-Lumen Catheter Malpositioning in an Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infant.Pediatric reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patent ductus venosus (PDV) is a rare form of congenital portosystemic shunt. Because of the diversity of clinical symptoms and insufficient knowledge of this condition, clinicians often fail to perform targeted examinations, resulting in missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses. This study summarized the clinical and radiological findings, as well as surgical methods, of PDV with the aim of improving early diagnosis and guiding treatment. Methods: Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data of patients with PDV were analyzed retrospectively. In all, 9 patients with PDV were included in the study (7 male, 2 female; median age 1.6 years, age range 16 days to 16.5 years). Results: Data for all 9 patients with PDV were reviewed. The most common initial clinical presentations were jaundice and respiratory symptoms. Laboratory data revealed hypoxemia in 5 patients, hyperammonemia in 2, hyperbilirubinemia in 7, abnormal coagulation function in 6, abnormal myocardial enzymes in 4, hepatic dysfunction in 8, and renal dysfunction in 3. The direct imaging sign of PDV was a vascular structure connecting the left branch of the portal vein (LPV) to the inferior vena cava. Secondary imaging findings observed in all 9 patients were dilated right heart, pulmonary artery, and LPV, and an atrophic right branch of the portal vein. The main portal vein was dilated in 8 patients and shrunk in 1. Moreover, 8 patients had enlarged livers, and 3 presented with hypoperfusion in the right lobe of the liver. The spleen was enlarged in 8 patients but shrunk in 1. Renal imaging was abnormal in 2 patients. Hepatic encephalopathy was found in 4 patients; 7 patients had PDV combined with other malformations, with congenital heart disease and vascular abnormalities being the most common; 3 patients successfully underwent surgical ligation of PDV. Conclusions: PDV can lead to multisystem damage. Secondary radiological signs of PDV play an important role in early diagnosis and preoperative evaluation. Complications and coexisting malformations were common and should not be missed during preoperative evaluation. Early surgical closure for PDV is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.