Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329964›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022

Hemodynamic indices in pulmonary hypertension: a narrative review.

Gaurav Manek, Manasvi Gupta, Mamta Chhabria, Divyansh Bajaj, Ankit Agrawal, Adriano R Tonelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Treatment of pulmonary hypertension after seven world symposia.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaurav Manek *Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Manasvi Gupta *Department of Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Mamta ChhabriaDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Divyansh BajajDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ankit AgrawalDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Adriano R TonelliDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg and its presence is associated with worse outcomes. A comprehensive hemodynamic evaluation of the pulmonary circulation is essential for diagnosis, hemodynamic classification, and prognostication. A multitude of indices assess different aspects of the pulmonary circulation but there are no reviews that describe their specific value in PH. Methods: We performed a thorough literature search of relevant articles in English from 1970-2021 using PubMed. Key Content and Findings: In this article, we present both static and dynamic indices used for the hemodynamic assessment of PH. While some of these indices are routinely used in clinical practice, including cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR); others such as pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary effective arterial elastance (Ea), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) are gaining popularity by enhancing the understanding of different aspects of the pulmonary circulation. We described the advantages and pitfalls of various indices, including when to use them in the hemodynamic evaluation of patients with PH. Conclusions: A variety of indices measuring different aspects of the right ventricle (RV)-pulmonary arteries (PA) system provide valuable information in patients with PH. However, it remains important to develop and validate indices that provide a comprehensive hemodynamic evaluation to improve outcomes in patients with PH.

Indexed as

hemodynamicindicesPulmonary hypertension (PH)

Identifiers

PMID36329964
PMCPMC9622402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.