ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022
Treatment of advanced heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease: a narrative review and clinical cases.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual Disease Burden: Growing Older with Congenital Heart Disease and Hereditary Metabolic and Connective Tissue Disorders-Data from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry on Heart Failure.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transforming Human Amniotic Membrane into Nanoparticles: An Approach for Cardiac Delivery Systems.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: one disease, diverse manifestations-a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Diagnosis, management, and outcome of heart failure in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA)-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- The Right Heart in Congenital Heart Disease.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is increasing worldwide. Almost all congenital cardiac lesions can be successfully treated due to the progress in neonatal surgery and pediatric cardiology with a high likelihood of surviving until adulthood. However, ACHD frequently develop sequelae related to the initial cardiac anomaly. Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common complications associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Methods: The authors did search the PubMed database regarding relevant content covering publications up to March 2022. Relevant manuscripts were classified according to the impact factor of the journal, being a guideline manuscript, a position paper by a society or a comprehensive review of the current literature. Key Content and Findings: Optimal HF treatment remains an unmet need in ACHD. In particular, advanced HF therapy with cardiac resynchronization therapy, ventricular assist devices or organ transplantation is still very different and more specific in ACHD compared to non-ACHD. This review aims to compile international views and evidence from the literatures on the treatment of advanced HF in ACHD. Current challenges, but also the success of different treatment strategies in ACHD are illustrated by clinical cases. Conclusions: The main finding of the review is that data is still scarce regarding ACHD with advanced HF and international efforts to collect data regarding these patients needed to improve the current standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.