Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Toward biophysical markers of depression vulnerability.

D A Pinotsis, S Fitzgerald, C See, A Sementsova, A S Widge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D A PinotsisCentre for Mathematical Neuroscience and Psychology, Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
S FitzgeraldCentre for Mathematical Neuroscience and Psychology, Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
C SeeDepartment of Computer Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
A SementsovaDepartment of Computer Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
A S WidgeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

Measuring, Modeling, and Modulating Cross-Frequency CouplingR01EB026938 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI EDEN, URI TZVI, KRAMER, MARK ALAN · 2018 to 2020
$1.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major difficulty with treating psychiatric disorders is their heterogeneity: different neural causes can lead to the same phenotype. To address this, we propose describing the underlying pathophysiology in terms of interpretable, biophysical parameters of a neural model derived from the electroencephalogram. We analyzed data from a small patient cohort of patients with depression and controls. Using DCM, we constructed biophysical models that describe neural dynamics in a cortical network activated during a task that is used to assess depression state. We show that biophysical model parameters are biomarkers, that is, variables that allow subtyping of depression at a biological level. They yield a low dimensional, interpretable feature space that allowed description of differences between individual patients with depressive symptoms. They could capture internal heterogeneity/variance of depression state and achieve significantly better classification than commonly used EEG features. Our work is a proof of concept that a combination of biophysical models and machine learning may outperform earlier approaches based on classical statistics and raw brain data.

Indexed as

biomarkersdepressiondynamic causal modeling (DCM)event-related potentials (ERPs)machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36329919
PMCPMC9622949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.