Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329796›Full record

Trial reportF1000Research2022

Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.

Camilla Alderighi, Raffaele Rasoini, Giulio Formoso, Maria Grazia Celani, Sarah E Rosenbaum

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in F1000Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Camilla AlderighiAssociazione Alessandro Liberati Cochrane Affiliate Centre, Lauria, Italy.
Raffaele RasoiniAssociazione Alessandro Liberati Cochrane Affiliate Centre, Lauria, Italy.
Giulio FormosoAssociazione Alessandro Liberati Cochrane Affiliate Centre, Lauria, Italy.
Maria Grazia CelaniAssociazione Alessandro Liberati Cochrane Affiliate Centre, Lauria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-263X
Sarah E RosenbaumCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8334-7664
Cochrane · GBAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NORegione Puglia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Informed Health Choices (IHC) project team developed learning resources for primary school children to teach critical thinking about treatments claims and health choices and evaluated their effect in a randomized controlled trial of 120 schools in Uganda. Children taught with these resources showed a better ability to think critically about treatments claims and health choices than children not taught with these resources. Teams in multiple countries are contextualising the IHC resources for use in other languages and settings; in this pilot we describe contextualization for use in Italian primary school.  Methods After translating the IHC resources to Italian and holding an introductory workshop with participating schoolteachers, we piloted the resources with two classes of a primary school in Florence over nine lessons. Our aims were: 1) to assess the feasibility of introducing the IHC curriculum in Italian primary school; 2) to evaluate students' ability to assess health claims and make informed health choices; to explore 3) students' and 4) teachers' experiences with the IHC learning resources; 5) to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of IHC learning resources in Italian primary school. To assess these objectives, we used qualitative and quantitative methods. Results Both qualitative and quantitative analyses consistently showed that the IHC learning resources had a positive impact on the objectives examined. The resources integrated well into the Italian primary school curriculum. Both students and teachers considered these resources comprehensible, appealing in design and content, and stimulating for the development of a critical attitude. The only barrier teachers and students expressed was using the resources in a remote learning context.  Conclusions Findings from our contextualisation of IHC learning resources in Italian primary school indicate that these resources are well-suited for Italian teachers and students in a primary school context and compatible with the Italian primary school curriculum.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth EducationChildFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPilot ProjectsSchoolscritical health literacyCritical thinkingevidence-based medicinehealth literacyinformed health choicespublic health

Identifiers

PMID36329796
PMCPMC9617069
OpenAlexW4304782289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.