Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329606›Full record

ArticleNutrition bulletin2022

Attention to detail: A photo-elicitation study of salience and packaging design for portion control and healthy eating.

Ruiqi Chu, Tang Tang, Marion M Hetherington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruiqi ChuSchool of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-2161
Tang TangSchool of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-7271
Marion M HetheringtonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-5234

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence demonstrates that food packaging attracts consumers to purchase and has the potential to nudge consumers towards healthy choices, including reducing portion size. However, food purchasing decisions are often automatic and packaging features may go unnoticed. Therefore, it is important to understand what consumers identify as most salient about packaging: what they notice and why, and which elements might nudge consumers towards healthy options and smaller portions of high-energy-density foods. This study explored consumer perception of food packaging, investigated specific features associated with portion control and elicited design ideas to improve packaging for healthy eating and downsizing. A qualitative approach was adopted applying a participant-driven photo-elicitation (PDPE) task with in-depth interviews. Participants were 25 adults living in the UK (aged 20-32 years; 17 females, 8 males,

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyPortion SizeAdultConsumer BehaviorFemaleFood PackagingHumansMaleServing Sizedesigndownsizingfood packagingphoto-elicitationportion controlsalience

Identifiers

PMID36329606
PMCPMC10092796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.