Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329508›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Isolation and identification of the broad-spectrum high-efficiency phage vB_SalP_LDW16 and its therapeutic application in chickens.

Shengliang Cao, Wenwen Yang, Xihui Zhu, Cheng Liu, Jianbiao Lu, Zhenshu Si, Lanying Pei, Leilei Zhang, Wensi Hu, Yanlan Li and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel LyticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengliang Cao *Phage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Wenwen Yang *Phage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Xihui ZhuPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Cheng LiuPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Jianbiao LuPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Zhenshu SiPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Lanying PeiPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Leilei ZhangPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Wensi HuPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Yanlan LiPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Zhiwei WangPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Zheyu PangPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Xijuan XueShandong Sinder Technology Co., Ltd., Sinder Industrial Park, Shungeng Road, Zhucheng Development Zone, Weifang, Shandong, 262200, China.
Yubao LiPhage Research Center, Liaocheng University, No. 1 Hunan Road, 252000, Liaocheng, Shandong, China. liyubao@lcu.edu.cn.
Liaocheng University · CNShandong Sinder Technology Co., Ltd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalmonella infection in livestock and poultry causes salmonellosis, and is mainly treated using antibiotics. However, the misuse use of antibiotics often triggers the emergence of multi-drug-resistant Salmonella strains. Currently, Salmonella phages is safe and effective against Salmonella, serving as the best drug of choice. This study involved 16 Salmonella bacteriophages separated and purified from the sewage and the feces of the broiler farm. A phage, vB_SalP_LDW16, was selected based on the phage host range test. The phage vB_SalP_LDW16 was characterized by the double-layer plate method and transmission electron microscopy. Furthermore, the clinical therapeutic effect of phage vB_SalP_LDW16 was verified by using the pathogenic Salmonella Enteritidis in the SPF chicken model.

resultsThe phage vB_SalP_LDW16 with a wide host range was identified to the family Siphoviridae and the order Caudoviridae, possess a double-stranded DNA and can lyse 88% (22/25) of Salmonella strains stored in the laboratory. Analysis of the biological characteristics, in addition, revealed the optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI) of vB_SalP_LDW16 to be 0.01 and the phage titer to be up to 3 × 10

conclusionsThe phage vB_SalP_LDW16 is a highly lytic phage with a wide host range, which can be potentially used for preventing and treating chicken salmonellosis, as an alternative or complementary antibiotic treatment in livestock farming.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesSalmonella Food PoisoningSalmonella InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensGenome, ViralSalmonella enteritidisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological characteristicsPhages vB_SalP_LDW16Phage therapyRecovery rateSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID36329508
PMCPMC9632116
OpenAlexW4308303346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.