Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329468›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Systematic evaluation of the pre-eclampsia drugs, dietary supplements and biologicals pipeline using target product profiles.

Annie R A McDougall, Roxanne Hastie, Maya Goldstein, Andrew Tuttle, Stephen Tong, Anne Ammerdorffer, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polyphenols for the Prevention or Management of Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Statins for preventing preeclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Secondary prevention of preeclampsia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The great obstetrical syndromes and the placenta.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annie R A McDougallMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. annie.mcdougall@burnet.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-6679
Roxanne HastieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.
Maya GoldsteinPolicy Cures Research, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew TuttlePolicy Cures Research, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen TongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.
Anne AmmerdorfferConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
A Metin GülmezogluConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUConcept Foundation · CHPolicy Cures · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Accelerating Innovation for Mothers (AIM) project established a database of candidate medicines in research and development (R&D) between 2000 and 2021 for five pregnancy-related conditions, including pre-eclampsia. In parallel, we published target product profiles (TPPs) that describe optimal characteristics of medicines for use in preventing/treating pre-eclampsia. The study objective was to use systematic double screening and extraction to identify all candidate medicines being investigated for pre-eclampsia prevention/treatment and rank their potential based on the TPPs.

methodsAdis Insight, Pharmaprojects, WHO international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP), PubMed and grant databases were searched (Jan-May 2021). The AIM database was screened for all candidates being investigated for pre-eclampsia. Candidates in clinical development were evaluated against nine prespecified criteria from TPPs identified as key for wide-scale implementation, and classified as high, medium or low potential based on matching to the TPPs. Preclinical candidates were categorised by product type, archetype and medicine subclass.

resultsThe AIM database identified 153 candidates for pre-eclampsia. Of the 87 candidates in clinical development, seven were classified as high potential (prevention: esomeprazole, L-arginine, chloroquine, vitamin D and metformin; treatment: sulfasalazine and metformin) and eight as medium potential (prevention: probiotic lactobacilli, dalteparin, selenium and omega-3 fatty acid; treatment: sulforaphane, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and vitamin B3). Sixty-six candidates were in preclinical development, the most common being amino acid/peptides, siRNA-based medicines and polyphenols.

conclusionsThis is a novel, evidence-informed approach to identifying promising candidates for pre-eclampsia prevention and treatment - a vital step in stimulating R&D of new medicines for pre-eclampsia suitable for real-world implementation.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsMetforminPre-EclampsiaDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansPregnancyVitamin DBiological ProductsMetforminVitamin DChloroquineDrug developmentEsomeprazoleHypertensionL-ArginineMaternal medicineMetforminPregnancySulfasalazineVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36329468
PMCPMC9635102
OpenAlexW4308425390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.