Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329443›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Anxiety and depression in the post-pandemic era: concerns about viral mutation and re-outbreak.

Zedong Li, Jin Li, Yamin Li, Feng Tian, Jin Huang, Zhihong Wang, Mingming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zedong LiClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Anesthesia, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yamin LiClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Feng TianDepartment of Nursing, Zhangjiajie People's Hospital, 192 Guyong road, Zhangjiajie, Hunan, China.
Jin HuangClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhihong WangClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mingming WangClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. mingmingw2008@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2020 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has been raging for more than 20 months, putting significant strain on public health systems around the world. Despite the fact that the pandemic has been effectively managed in certain countries, regional outbreaks and viral mutations continue to pose a threat to people's lives. The likelihood of post-pandemic changes in people's psychological situations warrants more investigation. DESIGN AND

participantsThis study was conducted in the context of another outbreak in Zhangjiajie, China, respondents (infected patients, healthy population) were required to complete self-administered questions and standardized questionnaires, including the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ). MEASURES: We conducted an anonymous questionnaire survey of infected patients (excluding critically ill patients) in the confirmed COVID-19 ward of Zhangjiajie City People's Hospital's East Hospital from August 14 to 24, 2021, and used convenience sampling to survey medical staff and the general public to assess the psychological reactions of different populations during the delta variant outbreak pandemic. Differences in anxiety and depression severity were compared between groups, with logistic regression models constructed to explore potential factors associated with scoring clinical significant levels of depression and/or anxiety.

resultsThere is no significant difference (p value = 0.228) between anxiety and depression in patients (n = 53), general public (n = 97), medical personnel (n = 103), and support workers (n = 65). Females reported higher scores on the GAD-7 and the BIPQ, reduced communication with family and friends appeared to be a risk factor for clinically significant anxiety and depression.

conclusionsThere were no significant differences in anxiety and depression across populations explored in this study, but females had higher anxiety and illness perception than males, and effective communication may help improve mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersChinaDepressionDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansMaleMutationSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyCOVID-19Depression

Identifiers

PMID36329443
PMCPMC9630811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.