Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329424›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study.

Hanpeng Xu, Xiaodong Wang, Ye Han, Yuanyuan Jiang, Jianzhong Wang, Xiong Zhang, Jun Miao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanpeng Xu *Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaodong Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Ye Han *Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Yuanyuan JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Jianzhong WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Xiong ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Jun MiaoTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. mj6688@163.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CNTianjin Hospital · CNTianjin University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472140Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City S20ZDD484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse and compare the biomechanical differences between 3D-printed prostheses, titanium mesh cages and poorly matched titanium mesh cages in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES).

methodsThe finite element model of T10-L2 for healthy adults was modified to make three models after T12 total spondylectomy. These models were a 3D-printed prosthesis, titanium mesh cage and prosthesis-endplate mismatched titanium mesh cage for reconstruction. The range of motion (ROM), stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system of three models in flexion and extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated and analysed by ABAQUS.

resultIn flexion, due to the support of the anterior prosthesis, the fixation system showed the maximum fixation strength. The fixation strength of the 3D-printed prosthesis model was 26.73 N·m /°, that of the TMC support model was 27.20 N·m /°, and that of the poorly matched TMC model was 24.16 N·m /°. In flexion, the L1 upper endplate stress of the poorly matched TMC model was 35.5% and 49.6% higher than that of the TMC and 3D-printed prosthesis, respectively. It was 17% and 28.1% higher in extension, 39.3% and 42.5% higher in lateral bending, and 82.9% and 91.2% higher in axial rotation, respectively. The lower endplate of T11 showed a similar trend, but the magnitude of the stress change was reduced. In the stress analysis of the 3D-printed prosthesis and TMC, it was found that the maximum stress was in flexion and axial rotation, followed by left and right bending, and the least stress was in extension. However, the mismatched TMC withstood the maximum von Mises stress of 418.7 MPa (almost twice as much as the buckling state) in rotation, 3 times and 5.83 times in extension, and 1.29 and 2.85 times in lateral bending, respectively.

conclusionDifferent prostheses with good endplate matching after total spondylectomy can obtain effective postoperative stable support, and the reduction in contact area caused by mismatch will affect the biomechanical properties and increase the probability of internal fixation failure.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionTitaniumAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansLumbar VertebraeRange of Motion, ArticularRotationTitanium3D-printed prosthesisFinite element analysisTESTitanium mesh cage

Identifiers

PMID36329424
PMCPMC9635202
OpenAlexW4308202705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.