Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329396›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022

The cardiac distress inventory: A new measure of psychosocial distress associated with an acute cardiac event.

Alun C Jackson, Michael R Le Grande, Michelle C Rogerson, Chantal F Ski, John Amerena, Julian A Smith, Valerie Hoover, Marlies E Alvarenga, Rosemary O Higgins, David R Thompson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alun C JacksonAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. alun.jackson@australianhearthealth.org.au.
Michael R Le GrandeAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michelle C RogersonAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chantal F SkiAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John AmerenaBarwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Julian A SmithDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Valerie HooverDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marlies E AlvarengaAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rosemary O HigginsAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David R ThompsonAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Barbara M MurphyAustralian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany challenges are posed by the experience of a heart attack or heart surgery which can be characterised as 'cardiac distress'. It spans multiple psychosocial domains incorporating patients' responses to physical, affective, cognitive, behavioural and social symptoms and experiences related to their cardiac event and their recovery. Although some measures of the psychological and emotional impacts of a cardiac event exist, none provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac distress. To address this gap, the study aimed to develop a Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) using best practice in instrument design.

methodAn item pool was generated through analysis of cognate measures, mostly in relation to other health conditions and through focus group and individual review by a multidisciplinary development team, cardiac patients, and end-users including cardiac rehabilitation co-ordinators. The resulting 144 items were reduced through further reviews to 74 for testing. The testing was carried out with 405 people recruited from three hospitals, through social media and by direct enrolment on the study website. A two-stage psychometric evaluation of the 74 items used exploratory factor analysis to extract the factors followed by Rasch analysis to confirm dimensionality within factors.

resultsPsychometric analysis resulted in the identification of 55 items comprising eight subscales, to form the CDI. The subscales assess fear and uncertainty, disconnection and hopelessness, changes to roles and relationships, overwhelm and depletion, cognitive challenges, physical challenges, health system challenges, and death concerns. Validation against the Kessler 6 supports the criterion validity of the CDI.

conclusionThe CDI reflects a nuanced understanding of cardiac distress and should prove to be a useful clinical assessment tool, as well as a research instrument. Individual subscales or the complete CDI could be used to assess or monitor specific areas of distress in clinical practice. Development of a short form screening version for use in primary care, cardiac rehabilitation and counselling services is warranted.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiovascular diseaseMeasurementMental healthPsychological distressPsychometric analysisScale development

Identifiers

PMID36329396
PMCPMC9633013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.