ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022
The cardiac distress inventory: A new measure of psychosocial distress associated with an acute cardiac event.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric properties of the Swedish cardiac anxiety questionnaire: a Rasch analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Italian Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Cardiac Distress Inventory in Patients with Recent Cardiac Events.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of a Thai Version of the Cardiac Distress Inventory.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease-Related Distress and Psychosocial Determinants: A Prospective Observational Study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Development and Validation of a Measure of Psychological Distress After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: The Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Distress Inventory.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of recurrence and progression in cardiac patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Haemodialysis distress thermometer scale: Turkish validity and reliability study.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the cardiac distress inventory in Iranian patients with heart disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fear of Recurrence and Progression in People with Heart Disease: Risk Factors and Implications for Emotional Support.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protocol for the development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of disease progression and recurrence in cardiac patients.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2024Article
- Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Distress Inventory - Short Form among people with cardiac diseases in Hong Kong.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Development of a short form of the Cardiac Distress Inventory.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany challenges are posed by the experience of a heart attack or heart surgery which can be characterised as 'cardiac distress'. It spans multiple psychosocial domains incorporating patients' responses to physical, affective, cognitive, behavioural and social symptoms and experiences related to their cardiac event and their recovery. Although some measures of the psychological and emotional impacts of a cardiac event exist, none provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac distress. To address this gap, the study aimed to develop a Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) using best practice in instrument design.
methodAn item pool was generated through analysis of cognate measures, mostly in relation to other health conditions and through focus group and individual review by a multidisciplinary development team, cardiac patients, and end-users including cardiac rehabilitation co-ordinators. The resulting 144 items were reduced through further reviews to 74 for testing. The testing was carried out with 405 people recruited from three hospitals, through social media and by direct enrolment on the study website. A two-stage psychometric evaluation of the 74 items used exploratory factor analysis to extract the factors followed by Rasch analysis to confirm dimensionality within factors.
resultsPsychometric analysis resulted in the identification of 55 items comprising eight subscales, to form the CDI. The subscales assess fear and uncertainty, disconnection and hopelessness, changes to roles and relationships, overwhelm and depletion, cognitive challenges, physical challenges, health system challenges, and death concerns. Validation against the Kessler 6 supports the criterion validity of the CDI.
conclusionThe CDI reflects a nuanced understanding of cardiac distress and should prove to be a useful clinical assessment tool, as well as a research instrument. Individual subscales or the complete CDI could be used to assess or monitor specific areas of distress in clinical practice. Development of a short form screening version for use in primary care, cardiac rehabilitation and counselling services is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.