Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329389›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

A multi-level perspective on perceived unmet needs for home support in home-dwelling older adults in the Swiss context: a secondary data analysis of a population study.

Maria Jose Mendieta, Sabina M De Geest, Geert Goderis, Olivia Yip, Mieke Deschodt, Suzanne Dhaini, INSPIRE Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Jose MendietaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabina M De GeestDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. sabina.degeest@unibas.ch.
Geert GoderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center of General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivia YipDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mieke DeschodtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Suzanne DhainiDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
INSPIRE Consortium
University of Basel · CHKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnmet needs for home support occur when any support services perceived by older people as needed are not being received. Not meeting these needs can negatively impact older adults' quality of life, and increase health care utilization, hospitalizations, institutionalizations, or death. To date there is no consensus in how to define and assess these unmet needs. In parallel, previous research of factors associated with unmet needs for home support has mostly focused on factors at the micro level. Thus, this paper aims to identify the prevalence of unmet needs for home support among a home-dwelling older population and the factors at the macro, meso and micro levels contributing to them.

methodsUsing an ecological approach we identified multi-level factors associated with the presence of unmet needs for home support among the home-dwelling older population (aged 75+) in Switzerland. This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE Population Survey of home-dwelling older adults (n = 8,508) living in Basel-Landschaft in Switzerland, conducted as part of the TRANS-SENIOR Project. Prevalence of perceived unmet needs for home support was self-reported, using a dichotomized question. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations of factors at each level with unmet needs for home support.

results4.3% of participants reported unmet needs for home support, with a median age of 81 years. 45.1% had private health insurance and 6.3% needed additional government support. Being a recipient of other type of government support (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.17-2.29) (macro-); the use of transportation services (OR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.15-2.57) (meso-); and feeling depressed (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.06-1.85) or abandoned (OR = 2.60; 95% CI = 1.96-3.43) (micro-) increased odds of having perceived unmet needs for home support. Having a private health insurance (macro-) (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.49-0.80), speaking Swiss-German (OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.24-0.88) or German (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.24-0.98), having a high level of education [primary (OR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24-1.02); secondary (OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.25-1.03); tertiary (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.19-0.82); other (OR = 0.31 (0.12-0.75)], having a high score of self-perceived health status [score ≥ 76 (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.20-0.96)] and having informal care (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.45-0.73), among others (micro-) were associated with decreased odds of having perceived unmet needs for home support.

conclusionOur study findings highlight the role of socio-economical inequality in the perception of unmet needs for home support in home-dwelling older adults. In order to address unmet needs in home-dwelling older adults, healthcare leaders and policy makers should focus on strategies to reduce socio-economic inequalities at the different levels in this population.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesData AnalysisHumansSwitzerlandEcological modelHome-dwelling older adultsHome supportSocio-economical inequalityUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID36329389
PMCPMC9635119
OpenAlexW4308432378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.