Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329333›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2022

The Role and Place of Thanatoradiological Studies in the Pathological Examination of Fetuses and Newborns.

U N Tumanova, A I Shchegolev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U N TumanovaV. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. patan777@gmail.com.
A I ShchegolevV. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of published data on the possibilities of using postmortem radiation studies in perinatology is carried out and the results of own thanatoradiological studies of the bodies of dead fetuses and newborns are presented. The possibilities of postmortem radiation studies for differential diagnosis of stillborn and deceased newborns, evaluation of the severity of maceration and the time of intrauterine fetal death, detection of pathological changes in the brain and spinal cord, respiratory and digestive organs, in the cardiovascular and urinary systems were demonstrated. It is concluded that postmortem CT has a high diagnostic efficiency in the study of the bone skeleton, free fluid accumulations in serous cavities and gas in the vessels and tissues of dead fetuses and deceased newborns. The advantage of postmortem MRI is more effective visualization of internal organs and soft tissues, which allows assessing their topography and size, as well as identifying a wide range of pathological changes. For a comprehensive objective analysis of the bodies of stillborn and deceased newborns, combined use of both imaging methods (CT and MRI) is required. At the same time, thanatoradiology should be used as a part of a comprehensive pathological study, but not as a substitute for traditional autopsy.

Indexed as

Fetal DeathFetusAutopsyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyStillbirthautopsyfetusnewbornpostmortem CTpostmortem MRIstillbornthanatoradiologyvirtopsy

Identifiers

PMID36329333
OpenAlexW4308073572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.