Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329304›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2023

Simple, inexpensive, and ergonomic phantom for quality assurance control of MRI guided Focused Ultrasound systems.

Anastasia Antoniou, Christakis Damianou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anastasia AntoniouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianou Street, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
Christakis DamianouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianou Street, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus. christakis.damianou@cut.ac.cy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-2851

Funding

Research and Innovation Foundation of Cyprus SOUNDPET (INTEGRATED/0918/0008)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe popularity of Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) as a beneficial therapeutic solution for many diseases is increasing rapidly, thus raising the need for reliable quality assurance (QA) phantoms for routine testing of MRgFUS systems. In this study, we propose a thin acrylic film as the cheapest and most easily accessible phantom for assessing the functionality of MRgFUS hardware and software.

methodsThrough the paper, specific QA tests are detailed in the framework of evaluating an MRgFUS preclinical robotic device comprising a single element spherically focused transducer with a nominal frequency of 2.75 MHz. These tests take advantage of the reflection of ultrasonic waves at a plastic-air interface, which results in almost immediate lesion formation on the film at a threshold of applied acoustic energy.

resultsThe phantom offered qualitative information on the power field distribution of the FUS transducer and the ability to visualize different FUS protocols. It also enabled quick and reliable assessment of various navigation algorithms as they are used in real treatments, and also allowed for the assessment of the accuracy of robotic motion.

conclusionTherefore, it could serve as a useful tool for detecting defects in system's performance over its lifetime after establishing a baseline while concurrently contributing to establish QA and calibration guidelines for clinical routine controls.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingSoftwareAcrylic filmCheapMRIPhantomQuality assuranceUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36329304
PMCPMC10247591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.