Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329209›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Health information behaviour and health literacy on COVID-19 vaccination of the general population in Germany-findings from the CoSiD study].

Catherin Bosle, Boris Orth, Nadine Reibling, Christina Merkel, Carolin Muschalik, Ursula von Rüden

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Barriers to vaccination - parents' attitudes towards HPV vaccination].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherin BosleReferat Q3 Evaluation, Methoden, Forschungsdaten, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland. catherin.bosle@bzga.de.
Boris OrthReferat Q3 Evaluation, Methoden, Forschungsdaten, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Nadine ReiblingHochschule Fulda, Leipziger Straße 123, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.
Christina MerkelReferat Q3 Evaluation, Methoden, Forschungsdaten, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Carolin MuschalikReferat Q3 Evaluation, Methoden, Forschungsdaten, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Ursula von RüdenReferat Q3 Evaluation, Methoden, Forschungsdaten, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Federal Centre for Health Education · DEFulda University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough COVID-19 vaccination reduces severe disease progression as well as hospitalisations and deaths, every fourth to fifth person in Germany is not vaccinated against COVID-19. Effective information and communication measures are needed to reach these people. For this, it is important to know the information behaviour as well as the health competences in the area of COVID-19 vaccination, especially of previously unvaccinated people.

methodsThe third representative population survey (November/December 2021; n = 4366) of the CoSiD study (Corona vaccination in Germany) was conducted as a combined telephone and online survey. Bivariate correlations between reported information behaviour, subjective health literacy and vaccination status and intention are investigated. In addition, multivariate correlations of socio-demographic characteristics and subjective health literacy are analysed.

resultsUndecided people and people that are more likely to vaccinate were overall less likely to report a good subjective level of information (46.1%; 41.1%) and competences in evaluating information about COVID-19 vaccination (36.5%; 38.8%) as well as decision making (39.0%; 35.9%). Unvaccinated people without vaccination intentions are more likely to report observing information rated as untrustworthy or wrong (60.3%). People with a lower level of education, younger people and people with a migration background report lower levels of heath literacy. DISCUSSION: Communication measures to promote health literacy should specifically address people with uncertain vaccination intentions as well as younger people, people with lower levels of education and people with a migration background.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyCOVID-19 VaccinesGermanyHealth PromotionHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationHealth literacyInformation behaviourRepresentative surveyVaccination intention

Identifiers

PMID36329209
PMCPMC9633030
OpenAlexW4308078201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.