ReviewPediatric radiology2023
Pediatric urolithiasis: what can pediatricians expect from radiologists?
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual energy CT of pediatric genitourinary disorders.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Enamel renal syndrome due to FAM20A mutations: challenging kidney management in view of nephrocalcinosis, hypophosphatemia and hypocalciuria.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Urolithiasis in Children-Clinical Picture, Pathogenesis, and Diagnostic Approach.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of urolithiasis in children has increased over the two last decades. Urolithiasis formation results from urine oversaturation following insufficient water intake, urinary obstruction (notably in cases of congenital uropathies), excess production of an insoluble compound, or imbalance between crystallization promoters and inhibitors. Whereas most urolithiases in adults occur secondary to environmental factors, in children, secondary causes are far more frequent, and 15% are related to genetic causes, most often monogenic. This is especially true in recurrent forms, with early and rapid progression and bilateral stones, and in cases of familial history or consanguinity. Because of differing clinical management, one should rule out cystinuria, primary hyperoxaluria and renal tubular acidosis, among other causes of urolithiasis. As such, a complete biochemical evaluation must be performed in all cases of pediatric urolithiasis, even in cases of an underlying uropathy. Ultrasound examination is the first-line modality for imaging pediatric urolithiasis, allowing both diagnosis (urolithiasis and its complications) and follow-up. US examination should also explore clues to an underlying cause of urolithiasis. This review is focused on the role of imaging in the management and etiological assessment of pediatric urolithiasis. Radiologists play an important role in pediatric urolithiasis, facilitating diagnosis, follow-up and surgical management. A trio of clinicians (pediatric nephrologist, pediatric surgeon, pediatric radiologist) is thus necessary in the care of these pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.