Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36329022›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2022

Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness.

Mark Banghart, Kyungmoo Lee, Mozhdeh Bahrainian, Kristen Staggers, Christopher Amos, Yao Liu, Amitha Domalpally, Benjamin J Frankfort, Elliott H Sohn, Michael Abramoff and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Low Myopes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark BanghartDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kyungmoo LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Mozhdeh BahrainianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kristen StaggersInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Christopher AmosInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yao LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0700-0148
Amitha DomalpallyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Benjamin J FrankfortDepartments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Elliott H SohnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Michael AbramoffDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3490-0037
Roomasa ChannaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA roomasa.channa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-6901
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Diabetic Retinopathy: Genetics and Neurodegeneration (MSN246458)K23EY030911 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHANNA, ROOMASA · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853NEI NIH HHS K23 EY030911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness.

methodsWe included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral domain-optical coherence tomography scans. mRNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses were determined for groups from different self-reported ethnic backgrounds. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariables including age, gender, ethnicity and refractive error were built, with and without adjusting for total retinal thickness.

results20237 participants were analysed. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was on average 0.9 μm (-1.2, -0.6; p<0.001) lower among Asians and 1.5 μm (-2.3, -0.6; p<0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, the average GC-IPL thickness was 1.9 μm (-2.5, -1.4; p<0.001) lower among Asians compared with white participants, and 2.4 μm (-3.9, -1.0; p=0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. After accounting for total retinal thickness, the layer thicknesses were not significantly different among ethnic groups. When considered as a proportion of total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was ~0.1 and GC-IPL thickness was ~0.2 across age, gender and ethnic groups.

conclusionsThe previously reported ethnic differences in layer thickness among groups are likely driven by differences in total retinal thickness. Our results suggest using layer thickness ratio (retinal layer thicknesses/total retinal thickness) rather than absolute thickness values when comparing retinal layer thicknesses across groups.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaNerve FibersHumansRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceImagingMaculaRetina

Identifiers

PMID36329022
PMCPMC9528673
OpenAlexW4298149544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.