ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2022
The Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque among Young Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe therapy on LDL-cholesterol reduction and non-invasive arterial injury markers in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, open-label, randomized study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques and Stenosis in Adults with Familial Hypercholesterolemia Needs Reappraisal: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Comparative Study of Carotid Ultrasound Findings in Patients With and Without Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Cureus · 2025Article
- Early Atherosclerosis in Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients: Significance of Vascular Markers for Risk Stratification.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Few data exist regarding when atherosclerotic changes occur among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Carotid ultrasonography is a non-invasive method of evaluating this issue. The present study (1) compared the clinical utilities of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) and (2) estimated the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis among patients with heterozygous FH (HeFH). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 511 patients under 30 years old who underwent carotid ultrasonography at our hospital from 2006 to 2019. We classified them into the HeFH group (n=78, 21.4±5.9 years old) and non-FH group (n=433, 23.4±6.0 years old) based on the clinical diagnosis and compared their cIMT and cPS values. In addition, we estimated the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis among young HeFH patients. Results There was no significant difference in the cIMT between the HeFH and non-FH groups (0.44 mm vs. 0.42 mm, p=0.25). In contrast, the cPS was significantly higher in the HeFH group than in the non-FH group (1.11 vs. 0.26, p=0.002). The regression equation for cPS of HeFH group was Y=-2.05+0.15X (r=0.37, p<0.001). Conclusion An assessment based on the cPS rather than the cIMT appears to be better to capture the progress of carotid atherosclerosis among young HeFH patients. Carotid atherosclerosis may start to develop at 14 years old in patients with HeFH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.