Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328466›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2022

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) flavours and devices used by adults before and after the 2020 US FDA ENDS enforcement priority: findings from the 2018 and 2020 US ITC Smoking and Vaping Surveys.

Shannon Gravely, Gang Meng, David Hammond, Jessica L Reid, Young S Seo, Andrew Hyland, K Michael Cummings, Cheryl Rivard, Geoffrey T Fong, Karin A Kasza

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shannon GravelyDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada shannon.gravely@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-9105
Gang MengDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica L ReidSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9909-6265
Young S SeoRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Andrew HylandRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-7017
Cheryl RivardRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Karin A KaszaRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-098X
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Waterloo · CAMedical University of South Carolina · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HAMMOND, DAVID · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
Assessing the impacts of the four 2019/2020 US federal-level tobacco control actions: flavors, youth marketing, youth access, and Tobacco 21R21DA053614 · NIDA · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI KASZA, KARIN A · 2021 to 2022
$414k
CIHR FDN-148477NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA053614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn February 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prioritised enforcement efforts against flavoured prefilled cartridge/pod electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), with the exception of tobacco and menthol. This study examined changes between prepriority enforcement (2018) and early postenforcement (February-June 2020) among adults on: ENDS flavours and devices used most often; location of last purchase of fruit/other-flavoured cartridges (covered under the enforcement priority); and smoking and vaping.

methodsPrevalence estimates came from 1608 adult frequent (≥weekly) ENDS users (current smokers (n=1072), ex-smokers (n=536)) who participated in the 2018 and/or 2020 US ITC Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Transitions between flavours/devices and changes in smoking/vaping were assessed among baseline respondents who were followed up in 2020 (n=360). Respondents self-reported the ENDS device (disposable, cartridge/pod or tank) and the flavor that they used most often: (1) tobacco flavors (tobacco/tobacco-menthol mix) or unflavored; (2) menthol/mint; (3) fruit/other flavors.

resultsCompared to 2018, in the first 5 months of the 2020 enforcement priority, there were significant increases in the prevalence of fruit/other-flavoured cartridges (7.9% to 12.4%,p=0.026) and menthol/mint cartridges (7.1% to 13.0%, p<0.01) and decreases in tobacco-flavoured tanks (15.5% to 10.0%,p=0.002) and fruit/other-flavoured tanks (38.7% to 33.6%,p=0.038). Fewer than 10% of adults used disposables in 2018 and 2020. Among the cohort sample, the most pronounced transitions between flavours/devices occurred among those who used flavoured cartridges covered under the enforcement priority (54.6% switched to a flavour and/or device excluded from enforcement). There was an increase in purchasing fruit/other-flavoured cartridges online and a decrease in retail locations except for vape shops. Overall, there were few changes in smoking and vaping behaviours.

conclusionsBetween 2018 and the early phase of the FDA's 2020 enforcement priority, prevalence of menthol/mint and fruit/other-flavoured cartridges increased among adults. Half of vapers using cartridge flavours covered in the enforcement switched to other flavours and/or devices that were exempt, with the exception of disposables. The extent to which more comprehensive restrictions may be problematic for adults who prefer a range of ENDS flavours remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdultFlavoring AgentsHumansMentholSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationFlavoring AgentsMentholelectronic nicotine delivery devicesnicotinenon-cigarette tobacco productspublic policy

Identifiers

PMID36328466
PMCPMC9641531
OpenAlexW4308640175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.