Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328460›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2022

Ethyl maltol, vanillin, corylone and other conventional confectionery-related flavour chemicals dominate in some e-cigarette liquids labelled 'tobacco' flavoured.

Esther E Omaiye, Wentai Luo, Kevin J McWhirter, James F Pankow, Prue Talbot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. e-Cigarette Tobacco Flavors, Public Health, and Toxicity: Narrative Review.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024
    Review
  8. Synthetic Cooling Agents in Australian-Marketed E-cigarette Refill Liquids and Disposable E-cigarettes: Trends Follow the U.S. Market.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther E OmaiyeDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Wentai LuoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kevin J McWhirterDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
James F PankowDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Prue TalbotDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA talbot@ucr.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8833-0845
Portland State University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Identification and toxicity of chemicals that are linked to EVALIR01ES029741 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI TALBOT, PRUDENCE · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increased popularity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has been linked to the abundance of flavoured products that are attractive to adolescents and young adults. In the last decade, e-cigarette designs have evolved through four generations that include modifications in battery power, e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid) reservoirs and atomiser units. E-liquids have likewise evolved in terms of solvent use/ratios, concentration and number of flavour chemicals, use of nicotine salts and acids, the recent increased use of synthetic cooling agents and the introduction of synthetic nicotine. Our current objective was to evaluate and compare the evolving composition of tobacco-flavoured e-liquids over the last 10 years.

methodsOur extensive database of flavour chemicals in e-liquids was used to identify trends and changes in flavour chemical composition and concentrations.

resultsTobacco-flavoured products purchased in 2010 and 2011 generally had very few flavour chemicals, and their concentrations were generally very low. In tobacco-flavoured refill fluids purchased in 2019 and Puff Bar Tobacco e-cigarettes, the total number and concentration of flavour chemicals were higher than expected. Products with total flavour chemicals >10 mg/mL contained one to five dominant flavour chemicals (>1 mg/mL). The most frequently used flavour chemicals in tobacco e-liquids were fruity and caramellic.

conclusionsThere is a need for continuous surveillance of e-liquids, which are evolving in often subtle and harmful ways. Chemical constituents of tobacco flavours should be monitored as they clearly can be doctored by manufacturers to have a taste that would appeal to young users.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentBenzaldehydesFlavoring AgentsHumansNicotinePyronesTasteYoung AdultBenzaldehydesethyl maltolFlavoring AgentsNicotinePyronesvanillinElectronic nicotine delivery devicesGlobal healthSurveillance and monitoringTobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID36328460
PMCPMC9664106
OpenAlexW4308366184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.