Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328402›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2023

Management of paediatric acute severe behavioural disturbance in emergency departments across Australia: A PREDICT survey of senior medical staff.

Elyssia M Bourke, Jonathan C Knott, Simon Craig, Franz E Babl, Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) Research Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elyssia M BourkeEmergency Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-0955
Jonathan C KnottDepartment of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-0440
Simon CraigEmergency Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Franz E BablEmergency Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1107-2187
Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) Research Network

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund Million Minds Mission GNT1179137National Health and Medical Research CouncilRoyal Children's Hospital Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD) is a condition seen with increasing frequency in EDs. It poses a significant risk to the patient and those around them. Little is known about the epidemiology or most effective management in the paediatric population. The aim of the present study is to clarify the practice of senior emergency doctors in Australia when managing paediatric ASBD.

methodsThe present study was a voluntary electronic questionnaire distributed to and undertaken by senior medical staff in EDs affiliated with the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network. Respondents reported on exposure to and confidence in managing paediatric ASBD and their current practices.

resultsA total of 227 (33%) clinicians completed the survey between February and May 2020. Most clinicians were caring for at least two young people with ASBD each week (72%), felt confident regarding the majority of components of management and referred to local clinical practice guidelines (69%). Agitation/sedation rating scales were seldom used (19%). There was a significant variation in self-reported management practices. The choice of whether to use medication at all, the medication chosen and route of administration all varied greatly. Respondents were more willing to provide parenteral medication to young people reported as having recreational drug intoxication (84%) than those with neurodevelopment disorders (65%) when the same degree of agitation was reported.

conclusionsWithin Australia, there is considerable variation in paediatric ASBD practice, in particular regarding medication provision. Further prospective research is required to inform best clinical practice.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMedical StaffAdolescentAustraliaChildHumansSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaireschild psychiatryhypnotic and sedativepaediatric emergency medicinepsychomotor agitation

Identifiers

PMID36328402
PMCPMC10946763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.