Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328392›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Effect of communicating community immunity on COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant people from ethnically diverse backgrounds: an experimental vignette study in the UK.

Sandro T Stoffel, Aradhna Kaushal, Aikaterini Grimani, Christian von Wagner, Falko F Sniehotta, Ivo Vlaev

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandro T StoffelDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aradhna KaushalDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-0624
Aikaterini GrimaniNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK aikaterini.grimani@wbs.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-6199
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7971-0691
Falko F SniehottaNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ivo VlaevNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-0144
University College London · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAchieving high vaccination coverage is vital to the efforts of curbing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public health and society. This study tested whether communicating the social benefit through community protection for friends and family members versus overall society, affects vaccination intention and perception among a sample enriched with respondents from black and ethnic minority backgrounds.

designA web-based experimental survey was conducted. Eligible participants were individually randomised, with equal probability, to one of the three experimental vignettes.

settingEngland.

participantsWe recruited 512 (212 white, 300 ethnically diverse) vaccine-hesitant members from an online panel. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The secondary outcome consisted of a behavioural measure in the form of active interest in reading more about the COVID-19 vaccine. Additional measures included the perceived importance and expected uptake in others, as well as the attitudes towards vaccination.

resultsLogistic regression models did not show an effect of the messages on intentions for the overall sample (

conclusionsThus, although highlighting the social benefits of COVID-19 vaccinations can increase intentions among vaccine non-intenders, they are unlikely to address barriers among ethnically diverse communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEthnicityHumansIntentionMinority GroupsPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited KingdomVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19infectious diseasespublic health

Identifiers

PMID36328392
PMCPMC9638751
OpenAlexW4308430028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.