Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328387›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial.

Henrik Marschall, Axel Forman, Sigrid Juhl Lunde, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Karina Ejgaard Hansen, Lene Vase

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05162794 (Is Laparoscopic Excision for Peritoneal Endometriosis Helpful or Harmful), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05162794 naunknown statusnot on this map

Is Laparoscopic Excision for Peritoneal Endometriosis Helpful or Harmful: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Three-armed Surgical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2022 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsEndometriosis, PeritoneumArmsLaparoscopy with excision, Laparoscopy without excision, Medical treatment-as-usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik MarschallSchool of Business and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark hmars@psy.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2770-5241
Axel FormanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sigrid Juhl LundeSchool of Business and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ulrik Schiøler KesmodelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Karina Ejgaard HansenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lene VaseSchool of Business and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlacebo-controlled surgical designs are recommended to ascertain treatment effects for elective surgeries when there is genuine doubt about the effectiveness of the surgery. Some elective surgeries for pain have been unable to show an effect beyond sham surgery, suggesting contributions from contextual factors. However, the nature of contextual factors in elective surgery is largely unexplored. Further, methodological difficulties in placebo-controlled surgical trials impact the ability to estimate the effectiveness of a surgical procedure. These include an overall lack of testing the success of blinding, absence of comparison to a no-surgery control group and dearth of test for neuropathic pain.For women with peritoneal endometriosis, there is uncertainty regarding the pain-relieving effect of surgery. Surgery may put patients at risk of complications such as postsurgical neuropathic pain, without guarantees of sufficient pelvic pain relief. The planned placebo-controlled trial aims to examine the effect of surgery on pelvic pain, widespread pain and neuropathic pain symptoms in women with peritoneal endometriosis, and to test the contribution of contextual factors to pain relief. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred women with peritoneal endometriosis will be randomised to either diagnostic laparoscopy with excision of endometrial tissue (active surgery), purely diagnostic laparoscopy (sham surgery) or delayed surgery (no-surgery control group). Outcomes include pelvic pain relief, widespread pain, neuropathic pain symptoms and quality of life. Contextual factors are also assessed. Assessments will be obtained at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months postrandomisation. Mixed linear models will be used to compare groups over time on all outcome variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in the Central Denmark Region (1-10-72-152-20). The trial is funded by a PhD scholarship from Aarhus University, and supported by a grant from 'Helsefonden' (20-B-0448). Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05162794.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLaparoscopyNeuralgiaFemaleHumansPelvic PainQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGYNAECOLOGYPAIN MANAGEMENTSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36328387
PMCPMC9639085
OpenAlexW4308026769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.