SynthesisBMJ open2022
Diagnostic accuracy of blood tests of inflammation in paediatric appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validating exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Reevaluating Nonoperative Management for Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Two Antibiotic Combinations for Conservative Treatment of Non-Complicated Appendicitis in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Impact of a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care: study protocol for a hybrid type 1 cluster randomised controlled trial.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Review
- Incremental diagnostic value of HSP-70, presepsin, and HO-1 for differentiating acute appendicitis from nonsurgical abdominal pain in children: a prospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- A Prospective Model for Detecting Missed Appendicitis in Low-Risk Pediatric Patients.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Association Between the Intensity of Abdominal Pain and a Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children.Journal of acute medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of physical examination, laboratory and radiologic findings in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram based on C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, and respiratory rate for predicting complicated appendicitis in children.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Salivary Biomarkers in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Salivary C-Reactive Protein: A Non-Invasive Alternative to Serum CRP in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of copeptin as a marker for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Article
- National Trends in Hospitalizations for Appendectomy in Children, 2001-2017.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Clinical features and perforation predictors of appendicitis in infants and toddlers under 3: A retrospective two-center study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Implications of Raftlin in different diseases: from molecular biology to diagnostic value.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Review
- The importance of Galectin-3 in the diagnosis of childhood acute appendicitis.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Validating the recording of exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Trends in C reactive protein testing: a retrospective cohort study in paediatric ambulatory care settings.BMJ open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePossible childhood appendicitis is a common emergency presentation. The exact value of blood tests is debated. This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of four blood tests (white cell count (WCC), neutrophil(count or percentage), C reactive protein (CRP) and/or procalcitonin) for childhood appendicitis.
designA systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central, Web of Science searched from inception-March 2022 with reference searching and authors contacted for missing/unclear data. Eligibility criteria was studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the four blood tests compared to the reference standard (histology or follow-up). Risk of bias was assessed (QUADAS-2), pooled sensitivity and specificity were generated for each test and commonly presented cut-offs. To provide insight into clinical impact, we present strategies using a hypothetical cohort.
results67 studies were included (34 839 children, 13 342 with appendicitis), all in the hospital setting. The most sensitive tests were WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL, 53 studies sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89)) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (≥7500 cells/µL, five studies sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.94)). Combination of WCC or CRP increased sensitivity further(≥10 000 cells/µL or ≥10 mg/L, individual patient data (IPD) of 6 studies, 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99)).Applying results to a hypothetical cohort(1000 children with appendicitis symptoms, of whom 400 have appendicitis) 60 and 40 children would be wrongly discharged based solely on WCC and ANC, respectively, 12 with combination of WCC or CRP.The most specific tests were CRP alone (≥50 mg/L, 38 studies, specificity 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91)) or combined with WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL and ≥50 mg/L, IPD of six studies, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95)).
conclusionsThe best performing single blood tests for ruling-out paediatric appendicitis are WCC or ANC; with accuracy improved combining WCC and CRP. These tests could be used at the point of care in combination with clinical prediction rules. We provide insight into the best cut-offs for clinical application. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017080036.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.