Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328382›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Diagnostic accuracy of blood tests of inflammation in paediatric appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Fawkner-Corbett, Gail Hayward, Mohammed Alkhmees, Ann Van Den Bruel, Jose M Ordóñez-Mena, Gea A Holtman

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validating exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. National Trends in Hospitalizations for Appendectomy in Children, 2001-2017.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

David Fawkner-CorbettNIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK david.fawkner-corbett@imm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-3682
Gail HaywardNIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-627X
Mohammed AlkhmeesDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-6938
Ann Van Den BruelEPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-2009
Jose M Ordóñez-MenaNIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8965-104X
Gea A HoltmanNIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-767X
University of Oxford · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePossible childhood appendicitis is a common emergency presentation. The exact value of blood tests is debated. This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of four blood tests (white cell count (WCC), neutrophil(count or percentage), C reactive protein (CRP) and/or procalcitonin) for childhood appendicitis.

designA systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central, Web of Science searched from inception-March 2022 with reference searching and authors contacted for missing/unclear data. Eligibility criteria was studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the four blood tests compared to the reference standard (histology or follow-up). Risk of bias was assessed (QUADAS-2), pooled sensitivity and specificity were generated for each test and commonly presented cut-offs. To provide insight into clinical impact, we present strategies using a hypothetical cohort.

results67 studies were included (34 839 children, 13 342 with appendicitis), all in the hospital setting. The most sensitive tests were WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL, 53 studies sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89)) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (≥7500 cells/µL, five studies sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.94)). Combination of WCC or CRP increased sensitivity further(≥10 000 cells/µL or ≥10 mg/L, individual patient data (IPD) of 6 studies, 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99)).Applying results to a hypothetical cohort(1000 children with appendicitis symptoms, of whom 400 have appendicitis) 60 and 40 children would be wrongly discharged based solely on WCC and ANC, respectively, 12 with combination of WCC or CRP.The most specific tests were CRP alone (≥50 mg/L, 38 studies, specificity 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91)) or combined with WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL and ≥50 mg/L, IPD of six studies, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95)).

conclusionsThe best performing single blood tests for ruling-out paediatric appendicitis are WCC or ANC; with accuracy improved combining WCC and CRP. These tests could be used at the point of care in combination with clinical prediction rules. We provide insight into the best cut-offs for clinical application. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017080036.

Indexed as

AppendicitisChildC-Reactive ProteinHematologic TestsHumansInflammationLeukocyte CountSensitivity and SpecificityC-Reactive ProteinACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEPAEDIATRICSPAEDIATRIC SURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36328382
PMCPMC9639107
OpenAlexW4308026633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.